“And How Are You Crazy?”
Alain De Botton posits in a popular May 28, 2016 New York
Times article entitled “Why You Will Marry the Wrong Person” that this question
is one that should be standard early in the dating process. Beyond claiming
that individuals highlight their strengths and rarely disclose their flaws in
the context of dating, De Botton suggests that people are generally dismissive
of the idea that they are anything but “really quite easy to live with.” As a
result of this optimistic self-perspective, De Botton frames marriages as a
“Gamble taken by two people who don’t know yet who they are or who the other
might be.”
Though marrying for a feeling of love may be widely more
acceptable in modern Western culture than marrying for previously popular
calculated reasons (e.g, strategic arranged marriages designed to benefit
monetary or status gains), De Botton is critical of the idea that today’s
couples marry to seek happiness. “What we really seek is familiarity,”
suggests De Botton, “Which may well complicate any plans we might have had for
happiness.”
Take, for instance, the example of a child whose first
experience of love was with a parent who had difficult regulating feelings of
anger. From De Botton’s perspective, that child may grow up to seek a familiar
brand of love that vacillates between care and angry outbursts. “We marry the
wrong people because we don’t associate love with feeling happy,” writes De
Botton. To quote Stephen Chbosky’s novel, The Perks of Being a Wallflower, “We
accept the love we think we deserve.”
Of course, the idea that warped perceptions of love
developed in childhood may complicate adult relationships is not a new concept.
Therapists at Relationships For Better have long suggested that
individuals may be tempted to ‘re-do’ their childhood relationship with their
parents through romantic relationships, perhaps to seek corrective experiences
in attempts to heal past wounds. For example, if a child felt rejected by a
narcissistic parent, they may be more likely as an adult to pursue a romantic
relationship with a narcissistic spouse in hopes of satisfying the need to be
loved by a person reminiscent of their parent. Rejection breeds obsession –
and parental rejection may result in obsession with love from a spouse with
similar qualities. Though this practice holds a certain kind of logic, the
outcome may well be disastrous for long-term marital happiness.
If individuals forgo a naively romantic expectation that
their spouse will satisfy their childhood yearnings for love, the result may be
a measured awareness that that one’s chosen spouse is merely human. In
other words, a spouse may not be able to completely undo childhood wounds
because they did not create those wounds in the first place. “It might sound
odd,” write De Bosson, “But pessimism relieves the excessive imaginative
pressure that our romantic culture places upon marriage. The failure of one
particular partner to save us from our grief and melancholy is not an argument
against that person and no sign that a union deserves to fail or be upgraded.”
If individuals release their partners of the responsibility
to fulfil their unmet emotional needs, what criteria might they prioritize in
a potential spouse? Perhaps sober-minded individuals may consider seeking
a spouse who is simply adept at coping with disagreements: to borrow a
brilliant phrase from De Bosson’s, “Compatibility is an achievement of love; it
must not be its precondition.”
Rather than attempting to marry a perfectly compatible
partner and ultimately feeling resigned with the awareness that the union is
problematically imperfect, perhaps general satisfaction in marriage may be more
realistically found in the awareness of the limitations of one’s partner to meet
all of one’s emotional needs. Unromantic as it may sound, the
understanding that each individual must take responsibility to tend to their
own emotional wounds may offer a more feasible course of action for dealing
with inevitable conflicts that eventually arise in marriage.
Projecting ideals like perfect compatibility and
uninterrupted happiness onto one’s relationship may be immediately gratifying.
Conversely, a depth of awareness into early violations of love and trust within
one’s family of origin may sound like a topic one may do well to avoid on a
date. However, couples that avoid the latter may not anticipate the emotional
‘work’ that is the trademark of sustained marriages.
Imagine if feelings of relational discontent were to be
examined through an awareness of how childhood wounds have been triggered,
paired with mutual efforts to take responsibility to personally address those
wounds. Imagine if partners were simply be aware of their inclination for
warped expectations based on unmet childhood needs and attempted to choose more
realistic expectations based on the reality that spouses are not, in fact,
their parents?
The result of such a process may be emotional and relational
growth, a sustainable model for marriage, and a sense of pride for facing
personal obstacles side-by-side. “And how are you crazy?” may not be such a bad
question to ask after all.
References:
Botton, A. D. (2016). Why You Will Marry the Wrong Person.
Retrieved July 24, 2016, fromhttp://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/29/opinion/sunday/why-you-will-marry-the-wrong-person.html
Chbosky, S. (1999). The perks of being a wallflower.
New York: Pocket Books.
About the Author
Megan Lundgren
, M.S. LMFTMegan Lundgren is a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist specializing in Relationship Therapy. At her group practice in Monrovia, a suburb of Los Angeles, Megan supervises a team of Therapists who focus on helping individuals and couples thrive in their closest relationships. Megan's husband, Daniel, also has a Master of Science in Marriage and Family Therapy and partners with Megan in running their practice, Relationships For Better: www.RelationshipsForBetter.com
Office Location:
140 East Colorado Boulevard #D
Monrovia, California
91016
United States
Phone: (626) 272-4908
Contact Megan Lundgren
Professional Website:
www.RelationshipsForBetter.com