Theravive Home

The Latest in Therapy News

August 5, 2016
by Henry M. Pittman, MA

Ubre Not Winning the Battle of Drunk Driving

August 5, 2016 06:01 by Henry M. Pittman, MA

It's Friday or Saturday night. It has been a long work week and one is looking forward to the weekend. A way to relax or reward oneself for the hard work one has put in generally is associated with a drink or two of an alcoholic beverage. No harm in that. The harm comes in when one has become intoxicated from the amount of alcohol he or she has consumed that night and decides to drive home under the influence. Alcohol begins to influence the human body at a BAC of 0.02 percent (Holzmueller, 2015).  Uber is an alternative to driving home or anywhere for that fact under the influence; however Uber is unable to make a dent in drunk driving. Therefore another alternative is needed.

Uber is car service in the spirt of a taxi, with lower rates. On July 29, 2016, an article was published revealing that Uber has been unsuccessful in deterring the number of alcohol related fatalities of drunk drivers (Kelly, 2016).  According to Holzmueller, (2015) “The most common BAC level is 0.17 with regards to fatal car crashes related to alcohol. Every month millions of individuals drive under the influence of alcohol in which Uber, who has thousands of drivers and growing, it’s unable to combat for that size of drivers.


An element of personal responsible begins with intentions. Is it the person’s intention to go out and become intoxicated or was it not their attentions to get intoxicated. It may seem that they are one in the same, yet they are not. An individual with the mind set of going out and getting drunk is making a conscious decision to take their vehicle as a transport to a venue or a place where alcohol is going to be served. He or she will utilize that opportunity and consume enough alcohol to obtain a buzz and then some, which usually ends up being intoxicated.

An individual with the mind set of going to a venue or place where alcohol is served and only plans to consume one or two, however ended up getting intoxicated from that amount or ended up having more than he or she planned to did not make a conscious to take they vehicle.

Now, regardless of how each of these two scenarios came to be, the results are the same, both are intoxicated and it’s time to go home. The individual that knew that he or she was going to get intoxicated is very less likely to utilize alternatives means of getting home such as an Uber, Taxi or designated driver. The reason is because if that was the case, they would have set those alternatives up before he or she begin their night.   

The individual that did not plan to go out and get intoxicated is more likely to utilize an alternative means of getting home with their safety in mind. However, because they did not intended to become intoxicated they may be more likely to drive themselves as well. Therefore, it doesn’t matter if the person intended or did not intended to become intoxicated, the ending results are the same. Kelly (2015) presented that individuals that are intoxicated are less likely to make rational decisions. What’s the solution?

Barriers Removed

A common theme that is present when individuals are intoxicated is that they do not want to leave there car. If an individual is intoxicated and utilizes Uber or a taxi or another person drives them home. The element of their car not being present at home when they sober up comes into question. He or she would have to contact another car service to pick them up and take them back to their car and then drive back home. Depending on the amount of alcohol consumed, even the next week is not safe. Therefore, may individuals who are intoxicated opt out of using an alternative to getting home. Holzmueller (2015) emphasis that in 2013 of the 11,307 deaths involved drivers who were intoxicated, all has BAC of 0.01 or higher.

The solution is utilizing a service called Designated Driver. In Korea, (Chung, J., Joo, H. H., & Moon, S., 2014) designated driver services has been around since the 1990s and increase. Chung et al, (2014) states, “The designated driver service replaces drunk driving by providing drunk drivers with rides using the drivers’ own vehicles, thus allowing them to reach home with their own vehicles (p. 1545). Since there existence there has been a decrease of alcohol related fatalities. This approach will solve the solution of having the intoxicated person’s car being left and presents it’s as a win/win for both parties.


Uber is a more affordable service to utilize than a taxi instead of driving home under the influence of alcohol. Driving under the influence of alcohol puts the driver and others on the road in harm’s way. Stats have shown that BAC at 0.01 has resulted in fatal accidents. Individuals that are intoxicated are less likely to think rational and utilize car service. A solution presented is the designated driver service which a designated driver will drive the intoxicated person home in their vehicle. Evidence has shown this impacting alcohol related accidents, however personal responsibility is to key because they intoxicated individual still have choice to contact them or not.


Chung, J., Joo, H. H., & Moon, S. (2014). Designated Driver Service Availability and Its Effects on Drunk Driving Behaviors. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis &Policy,  14(4),  1543–1567.

Holzmueller, C. B. (2015). Drunk driving. Salem Press Encyclopedia Of Health

Kelly, H. (2016). Uber doesn’t’ decrease drunk driving, study says. Retrieved from

About the Author

Henry M. Pittman Henry M. Pittman, MA

My name is Henry M. Pittman, MA. I am a Licensed Practitioner of the Healing Arts, Life Coach, Speaker, and Author. I help people to heal and/or develop the skills to overcome obstacles in their lives in order for them to create the life that they want.

Henry M. Pittman has a clinical practice in Houston, TX

blog comments powered by Disqus